Scratch an itch.
Research first
Revive dead project vs. rewrite
Note
I am not a lawyer.
http://opensource.org/licenses is pretty cool
" Freely used, modified, and shared"
MIT/X11: | Short, permissive, says attribution and no liability. Doesn't discuss copyright. Can convert to Apache 2 |
---|---|
Apache: | Short, permissive, goes in every file, grants patent rights from contributors to users, author keeps copyright. Plays nice with GPL3 (?) |
BSD: | Attribution, keep copyright, no liability |
AGPL: | Demands source distribution even when software not distributed (for cloud/hosted) |
GPL: | Viral, copyleft. Viral = infects entire program if it links to GPL library or uses a single line of GPL'd code |
LGPL: | Fixes library linking issue with GPL |
CC: | Non-code content |
Lurk more
Your nick is your reputation
It's okay to make mistakes... But learn from them.
Note
First contributions will be metric of how nice they are to newbies
There's a thing where older project members get grumpy at newbies because they've answered the question over and over... read docs/faq then improve them
Note
It will feel like you have only a vague idea what you're doing. This means you've found a project that's challenging and that you'll learn from.
Any questions about anything from this year?